ORIGINAL

Older Age and Single-Stage Clipping of Multiple Intracranial Unruptured Aneurysm Predict Worse One-Year Clinical Outcome

Idade Avançada e Clipagem de Múltiplos Aneurismas Intracranianos Não Rotos Em Abordagem Única Predizem Pior Resultado Clínico

  • Lucas Crociati Meguins (1)
  • Diogo André Taffarel (2)
  • Dionei Freitas de Morais (1)
  • Raquel Cristina Trovo Hidalgo (2)
  • Crescêncio Alberto Pereira Cêntola (2)
  • Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo (3)
  Views: 2793
  Downloads: 123

Resumo

Introdução: O aneurisma intracraniano não roto (AIU) é uma doença neurovascular comum com prevalência crescente na população idosa. Objetivo: O objetivo do presente estudo é investigar o papel da idade e da abordagem neurocirúrgica em estágio único de múltiplos AIU na evolução clínica. Métodos: A presente investigação foi realizada como um estudo observacional retrospectivo não randomizado, composto por prontuários de pacientes internados no Serviço de Neurocirurgia de um centro público terciário com aneurisma intracraniano não roto, entre outubro de 2015 e junho de 2020. Aos 12 meses após a intervenção cirúrgica, todos os pacientes foram submetidos a exame neurológico para avaliar performance status e déficits neurológicos. Resultados: Um total de 227 pacientes foi incluído na presente investigação, revelando 301 aneurismas intracranianos não rotos (taxa de aneurisma por paciente de 1,3). Cento e setenta e dois (75,77%) pacientes eram do sexo feminino, com 224 (74,42%) aneurismas tratados (taxa de aneurisma: 1,3); e 55 (24,23%) eram do sexo masculino com 77 (25,58%) aneurismas operados (taxa de aneurisma: 1,4). Duzentos e doze (93,39%) pacientes apresentavam mRS ≤ 3 no sexto mês de acompanhamento, dez (4,41%) com mRS 4-5 e 5 (2,20%) morreram (mRS 6). Ao dividirmos os pacientes em dois grupos, de acordo com a distribuição da idade, de todos os indivíduos com <70 anos (221 pacientes), 193 (96,02%) concluíram o acompanhamento com mRS ≤ 3, 6 (2,99%) com mRS 4 -5 e 2 (1,00%) morreram. Por outro lado, de todos os indivíduos com ≥70 anos (26 pacientes), dezenove (73,08%) concluíram o seguimento com mRS ≤ 3, 4 (15,38%) com mRS 4-5 e 3 (11,54%) morreram. Quando divididos em grupos de acordo com o número de aneurismas operados em estágio único, de todos os indivíduos com <4 formações saculares tratados durante a cirurgia (221 pacientes), duzentos e dez (95,02%) concluíram o acompanhamento com mRS ≤ 3, oito (3,62%) com mRS 4-5 e 3 (1,36%) morreram. De todos os indivíduos com ≥4 formações saculares tratados durante a cirurgia (6 pacientes), dois (33,33%) concluíram o acompanhamento com mRS ≤ 3, dois (3,33%) com mRS 4-5 e 2 (3,33%) faleceram. Conclusão: Segundo nossos achados podemos conclur que a idade avançada e clipagem em estágio único de múltiplos UIA (≥4 lesões) predizem pior resultado clínico em um ano.

Palavras-chave

Aneurisma intracraniano não roto; Idade avançada; Múltiplos aneurismas

Abstract

Introduction: Unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) is a common neurovascular disease with increasing prevalence in older population. Objective: The aim of the present study is to investigate the role of age and single-stage neurosurgical approach of multiple UIA in the clinical outcome. Methods: The present investigation was performed as a non-randomized retrospective observational study, composed of medical records of patients admitted at the Neurosurgical Department of a public tertiary center with unruptured intracranial aneurysm, between October 2015 and June 2020. At 12 months post-surgery follow-up, all patients underwent neurological examination in order to evaluate performance status and neurological deficits. Results: A total of 227 patients were included in the present investigation, revealing 301 intracranial unruptured aneurysms (aneurysm rate per patient = 1.3). One hundred seventy-two (75.77%) patients were female with 224 (74.42%) aneurysms treated (aneurysm rate = 1.3); and 55 (24.23%) were male with 77 (25.58%) aneurysms operated (aneurysm rate = 1.4). Two hundred twelve (93.39%) patients were mRS ≤ 3 in the sixth-month follow- up, ten (4.41%) were mRS 4-5 and 5 (2.20%) died (mRS 6). After divided the patients into two groups according to the age, from all individuals with <70 years-old (221 patients), one hundred ninety-three (96.02%) ended in follow-up as mRS ≤ 3, 6 (2.99%) as mRS 4-5 and 2 (1.00%) died. On the other hand, from all individuals with ≥70 years-old (26 patients), nineteen (73.08%) ended in follow-up as mRS ≤ 3, 4 (15.38%) as mRS 4-5 and 3 (11.54%) died. After grouping of patients according to the number of aneurysms operated on a single stage approach, from all individuals with <4 saccular formations treated during surgery (221 patients), two hundred ten (95.02%) ended in follow-up as mRS ≤ 3, eight (3.62%) as mRS 4-5 and 3 (1.36%) died. On the other hand, from all individuals with
≥4 saccular formations treated during surgery (6 patients), two (33.33%) ended in follow-up as mRS ≤ 3, two (3.33%) as mRS 4-5 and 2 (3.33%) died. Conclusion: According to our findings, we can conclude that older age and single-stage clipping of multiple (≥4 lesions) UIA predict worse one-year clinical outcome.

Keywords

Unruptured intracranial aneurysm; Older age; Single-stage approach

References

1.    Brown RD Jr, Broderick JP. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial screening. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(4):393-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1474-4422(14)70015-8. PMid:24646873.
2.    Etminan N, Rinkel GJ. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: development, rupture and preventive management. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(12):699-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.150. PMid:27808265.
3.    Rinkel GJE. Management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32(1):49-53. http://dx.doi. org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000642. PMid:30516639.
4.    Ajiboye N, Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Zanaty M, Bell R. Unruptured cerebral aneurysms: evaluation and management. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:954954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/954954. PMid:26146657.
5.    Etminan N, Dörfler A, Steinmetz H. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms- pathogenesis and individualized management. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(14):235-42. PMid:32449895.
6.    Hackenberg KAM, Hänggi D, Etminan N. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2018;49(9):2268-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/ STROKEAHA.118.021030. PMid:30355003.
7.    Ha SW, Choi PK, Oh JE, Park JS, Kang HG. Asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the older people. Eur Geriatr Med. 2019;10(1):119-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-018-0122-7. PMid:32720269.
8.    Malhotra A, Wu X, Forman HP, et al. Management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in older adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology. 2019;291(2):411-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ radiol.2019182353. PMid:30888931.
9.    Mahaney KB, Brown RD Jr, Meissner I, et al. Age-related differences in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: 1-year outcomes. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(5):1024-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2014.6.JNS121179. PMid:25170670.
10.    Shin BG, Kim JS, Hong SC. Single-stage operation for bilateral middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005;147(1):33- 8, discussion 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-004-0411-4. PMid:15565483.
11.    Choi HH, Cho YD, Yoo DH, et al. Intracranial mirror aneurysms: anatomic characteristics and treatment options. Korean J Radiol. 2018;19(5):849-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.5.849. PMid:30174473.
12.    Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2368-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000070. PMid:26089327.
13.    Steiner T, Juvela S, Unterberg A, Jung C, Forsting M, Rinkel G. European Stroke Organization guidelines for the management of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(2):93-112. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1159/000346087. PMid:23406828.
14.    Chaddad F No, Ribas GC, Oliveira E. The pterional craniotomy: step by step. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007;65(1):101-6. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0004-282X2007000100021. PMid:17420836.
15.    Chaddad-Neto F, Campos Filho JM, Dória-Netto HL, Faria MH, Ribas GC, Oliveira E. The pterional craniotomy: tips and tricks. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012;70(9):727-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004- 282X2012000900015. PMid:22990732.
16.    Chaddad-Neto F, Dória-Netto HL, Campos-Filho JM, Reghin-Neto M, Oliveira E. Pretemporal craniotomy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014;72(2):145-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20130202. PMid:24604369.
17.    Chaddad Neto F, Doria Netto HL, Campos Filho JM, Reghin Neto M, Silva-Costa MD, Oliveira E. Orbitozygomatic craniotomy in three pieces: tips and tricks. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2016;74(3):228-34. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20160024. PMid:27050853.
18.    Hicdonmez T, Hamamcioglu MK, Parsak T, Cukur Z, Cobanoglu
S. A laboratory training model for interhemispheric-transcallosal approach to the lateral ventricle. Neurosurg Rev. 2006;29(2):159-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-005-0014-4. PMid:16374648.
19.    Seoane E, Tedeschi H, de Oliveira E, Wen HT, Rhoton AL Jr. The pretemporal transcavernous approach to the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns: microsurgical anatomy and technique application. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(4):891-8, discussion 898-9. PMid:10764262.
20.    Krisht AF, Kadri PA. Surgical clipping of complex basilar apex aneurysms: a strategy for successful outcome using the pretemporal transzygomatic transcavernous approach. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(2, Suppl):261-73, discussion 261-73. PMid:15794823.
21.    Chaddad-Neto F, Doria-Netto HL, Campos Filho JM, Reghin-Neto M, Rothon AL Jr, Oliveira E. The far-lateral craniotomy: tips and tricks. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014;72(9):699-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004- 282X20140130. PMid:25252234.
22.    Broderick JP, Adeoye O, Elm J. Evolution of the modified rankin scale and its use in future stroke trials. Stroke. 2017;48(7):2007-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017866. PMid:28626052.
23.    Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/ american Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1711-37. http://dx.doi. org/10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839. PMid:22556195.
24.    Yang H, Jiang H, Ni W, et al. Treatment strategy for unruptured intracranial aneurysm in elderly patients: coiling, clipping, or conservative? Cell Transplant. 2019;28(6):767-74. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0963689718823517. PMid:30648433.
25.    Cagnazzo F, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G. Effect of age on outcomes and practice patterns for patients with anterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg Sci. 2020;64(3):225-30. http://dx.doi. org/10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03942-4. PMid:28079351.
26.    Smith MJ, Sanborn MR, Lewis DJ, Faught RW, Vakhshori V, Stein SC. Elderly patients with intracranial aneurysms have higher quality of life after coil embolization: a decision analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(12):898- 904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011394. PMid:25320053.
27.    Hishikawa T, Date I. Unruptured cerebral aneurysms in elderly patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017;57(6):247-52. http://dx.doi. org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0286. PMid:28428448.
28.    Shu X, Sun Z, Wu C, Wang F, Song Z, Yu X. [Surgical treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Feb;53(2):145-9. Chinese. PMID: 25908290.
29.    Guo S, Xing Y. Surgical treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(2):208-13. PMid:24831362.
30.    Wang WX, Xue Z, Li L, et al. Treatment strategies for intracranial mirror aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2017;100:450-8. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.049. PMid:28131928.
31.    Cho YD, Ahn JH, Jung SC, et al. Single-stage coil embolization of multiple intracranial aneurysms: technical feasibility and clinical outcomes. Clin Neuroradiol. 2016;26(3):285-90. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00062-014-0367-6. PMid:25516149.
32.    Xu K, Hou K, Xu B, Guo Y, Yu J. Single-stage clipping of seven intracranial aneurysms in the anterior circulation via unilateral pterional approach: a case report and literature review. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2020;81(3):271-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698381. PMid:31962354.
33.    Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Fotakopoulos G, Elera-Florez H, Hernesniemi J. Seven cerebral aneurysms: achallenging case fromthe andean slopes managed with 1-stage surgery. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:565-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.078. PMid:27777165.


1 MD, PhD, Service of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Base, Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto – FUNFARME, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.

2 MD, Service of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital de Base, Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto – FUNFARME, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.

3 MD, PhD, Service of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina – FM, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

 

Received Nov 7, 2021
Accepted Dec 20, 2021

JBNC  Brazilian Journal of Neurosurgery

JBNC
  •   ISSN (print version): 0103-5118
  •   e-ISSN (online version): 2446-6786
iThenticate
Open Access

Contact

Social Media

   

ABNc  Academia Brasileira de Neurocirurgia

  •   Rua da Quitanda 159 – 10º andar - Centro - CEP 20091-005 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ
  •   +55 21 2233.0323
  •    abnc@abnc.org.br

Sponsor

  • Hospital INC