CASE REPORT

Planejamento Pré-operatório por Meio de Manufatura Aditiva em Cranioestenose

Preoperative Planning Through Additive Manufacturing in Craniosynostosis

  • Ana Carolina Felipe da Silva (1)
  • Lorena Maria Dering (2)
  • Matheus Kahakura Franco Pedro (3)
  • Guilherme Ramina Montibeller (4)
  • André Giacomelli Leal (5)
  PDF  Versão Português
  PDF  English version
  Views: 2989
  Downloads: 143

Resumo

A cranioestenose acomete uma criança a cada 2.500 nascimentos, sendo uma doença rara ocasionada pelo fechamento prematuro das suturas cranianas. Dessa forma, leva a um crescimento inadequado do crânio e impede o desenvolvimento neurológico. O tratamento cirúrgico é o principal método de correção das cranioestenose. O planejamento do procedimento permite agilidade e cuidados com possíveis complicações durante a cirurgia propriamente dita. Nesse sentido, a manufatura aditiva, além de apresentar baixo custo e alta velocidade de produção, permite a elaboração de modelos de crânios específicos para as condições de cada paciente e, também, facilita a simulação cirúrgica. Apresentamos três casos do uso da manufatura aditiva no planejamento pré-operatório de correção de cranioestenose e os benefícios desta abordagem.

Palavras-chave

Manufatura aditiva; Cranioestenose; Tratamento cirúrgico; Planejamento cirúrgico; Craniotomia

Abstract

Craniosynostosis affects one child every 2,500 births, being a rare disease caused by premature closure of cranial sutures. Therefore, it causes inadequate skull growth and prevents neurological development and surgical treatment is the main method of craniosynostosis correction. The planning of procedure allows agility and care with possible complications during the surgery itself. In this sense, the additive manufacturing, besides its low cost and high production speed, it also allows the elaboration of specific skulls models for the conditions of each patient and facilitates the surgical simulation. Three cases of the use of additive manufacturing in the preoperative planning of craniosynostosis correction were presented with the benefits of this approach.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; Craniosynostosis; Surgical treatment; Surgical planning; craniotomy

References

1.    Coelho G, Warf B, Lyra M, Zanon N. Anatomical pediatric model for craniosynostosis surgical training. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30(12):2009- 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2537-x. PMid:25183390.
2.    Governale LS. Craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;53(5):394-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.07.006. PMid:26371995.
3.    Kajdic N, Spazzapan P, Velnar T. Craniosynostosis - Recognition, clinical characteristics, and treatment. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2018;18(2):110-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2017.2083.
4.    Coelho G, Figueiredo EG, Rabelo NN, Teixeira MJ, Zanon N. Development and evaluation of a new pediatric mixed-reality model for neurosurgical training. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019;24(4):423-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2019.2.PEDS18597. PMid:31374540.
5.    Sharma RK. Craniosynostosis. Indian J Plast Surg. 2013;46(1):18- 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.113702. PMid:23960302.
6.    Trace AP, Ortiz D, Deal A, et al. Radiology’s emerging role in 3-D printing applications in Health Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(7):856- 862.e4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.025. PMid:27236288.
7.    Alshomer F, Alfaqeeh F, Alariefy M, Altweijri I, Alhumsi T. Low-cost desktop-based three-dimensional-printed patient-specific craniofacial models in surgical counseling, consent taking, and education of parent of craniosynostosis patients: a comparison with conventional visual explanation modalities. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(6):1652-6. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005401. PMid:30946228.
8.    Coelho G, Rabelo NN, Vieira E, et al. Augmented reality and physical hybrid model simulation for preoperative planning of metopic craniosynostosis surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;48(3):1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2019.12.FOCUS19854.  PMid:32114555.
9. Ghizoni E, de Souza JPSAS, Raposo-Amaral CE, et al. 3D-printed craniosynostosis model: new simulation surgical tool. World Neurosurg. 2018;109:356-61.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.025. PMid:29061457.
10.    Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4. PMid:27769304.
11.    Volpato N. Manufatura aditiva: tecnologias e aplicações da impressão 3D. São Paulo: Editora Blucher; 2017.
12.    Jiménez Ormabera B, Díez Valle R, Zaratiegui Fernández J, Llorente Ortega M, Unamuno Iñurritegui X, Tejada Solís S. 3D printing in neurosurgery: a specific model for patients with craniosynostosis. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2017;28(6):260-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. neucir.2017.05.001. PMid:28666846.
13.    Choi JW, Kim N. Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in craniofacial plastic surgery. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(3):267-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.267. PMid:26015880.

1 Student at Biomedical School, Universidade Federal do Paraná – UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
2 Biomedical Scientist, Neurological Institute of Curitiba – INC, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
3 MD, Neurologist, Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute of Curitiba – INC, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
4 MD, Neurosurgeon, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute of Curitiba – INC, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
5 MD, PhD, Neurosurgeon, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute of Curitiba – INC, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

 

Received Jul 7, 2021
Accepted Jan 13, 2022

  Voltar

JBNC  Brazilian Journal of Neurosurgery

JBNC
  •   ISSN (print version): 0103-5118
  •   e-ISSN (online version): 2446-6786
iThenticate
Open Access

Contact

Social Media

   

ABNc  Academia Brasileira de Neurocirurgia

  •   Rua da Quitanda 159 – 10º andar - Centro - CEP 20091-005 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ
  •   +55 21 2233.0323
  •    abnc@abnc.org.br

Sponsor

  • Hospital INC